Page 1 of 1

Truly a work of art

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 12:28 am
by goomba_boy
I've taken a lot of screen shots over the past couple of days, but of all of the shots I've taken, this is by far the most important thing I have seen in regards to the expansion.

Image

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 04:11 am
by kandrak
Work it mama. :P

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 06:35 am
by Matthias
Haha. =)

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 07:48 am
by Voca
The miracle of women's armour. Itty bitty area, massive AC. :P

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 09:03 am
by Beli Flinthammer
yer mom!

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 09:08 am
by Clouseau
whatever

(but great shot, Guumby)

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 10:01 am
by goomba_boy
Voca wrote:The miracle of women's armour. Itty bitty area, massive AC. :P
The AC for female armor is a derived value. No male attacker will be capable of looking at any areas other than the 4 square inches of skin covered by the armor, and if you can't see it, you can't hit it.

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 10:01 am
by Widge
Impressive scenery!

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 11:41 am
by Vashanti
Can you say "Wedgie?"

:twisted:

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 06:10 pm
by Tleki
Ha! I showed the screenshot to my girlfriend, and she really wants to know what the "thong" piece is, so that her character can maybe get it!

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 08:42 pm
by Vashanti
Would it make me a perv if I saved that and made it a background?

:twisted:

Posted: 18 Jan 2007 08:45 pm
by goomba_boy
Vashanti wrote:Would it make me a perv if I saved that and made it a background?

:twisted:
Yes. Yes, it would.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 05:36 am
by Widge
goomba_boy wrote:
Vashanti wrote:Would it make me a perv if I saved that and made it a background?

:twisted:
Yes. Yes, it would.
To be fair, it would only make him one if he weren't already...

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 06:50 am
by Voca
Widge is correct; it would merely illustrate that you were a perv. :lol:

On the other hand, you aren't the one who took the shot!

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 10:17 am
by Vashanti
:lol:

Good point.

:D

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 01:29 pm
by goomba_boy
Voca wrote:On the other hand, you aren't the one who took the shot!
Great artists are always persecuted for the risks that they take and the societal norms that they challenge.

Either that or I am continuing to act out my inner pervert. I declare that time will be my judge!

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 02:47 pm
by Voca
Taking pictures of perky female behinds doesn't challenge a societal norm, it manifests one. Nice try, but no dice.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 03:04 pm
by goomba_boy
Voca wrote:Taking pictures of perky female behinds doesn't challenge a societal norm, it manifests one. Nice try, but no dice.
I respectfully disagree, perfesser.

VIEWING images of perky female posteriors does indeed manifest a societal norm. But the actual capturing of said images is still branded an art, and as such I am challenging convention. How I choose to define the "challenging" is up to me as the temperamental artistic type in the equation.

Posted: 19 Jan 2007 05:54 pm
by Voca
What exactly is challenging or risky about this conventional, albeit attractive, presentation of feminine buttocks attired in a thong? It appears to be the traditional family portrait school of naughty pictures.

Needless to say I don't think it will be showing at the Paris Museum of Erotica anytime soon. ;)

(I do recommend you visit said museum if you get the chance by the way, was definitely worth the price of admission. Kinda a seedy part of town though, go in the daytime.)